For my Republican Friends — All the Magical Thinking with none of the struggle. You’re welcome…
For my Republican Friends — All the Magical Thinking with none of the struggle. You’re welcome…
There are times — at the beginnings of wars usually — when one side knows a state of war exists while the other side doesn’t. Pearl Harbor comes to mind.
On the morning of December 7, 1941, the residents of Hawaii — Pearl Harbor in particular — slept soundly in their beds, unaware that they were moments away from being bombed, strafed, shot at and in every way attacked. Japan was at war with them. Japan knew it — they, unfortunately for them, did not.
That’s pretty much how the Left has been reacting to the Culture War the republican party declared not just on the Democratic Party but on the majority of Americans, too. We’ve been almost oblivious to it. We’ve heard the war-like chatter in the background but we’ve never taken it seriously. We damned well better — because the war Newt Gingrich talked his side into launching years ago has finally established significant beachheads in American Culture.
Michelle Cottle nails it: “In his zeal to cripple Democrats, Gingrich poisoned the public against the entire American political system. ”
In Newt’s own words: “You have to confront, delay, and undermine and impose failure in order to move the public.”
Newt made it his absolute goal to impose FAILURE on his perceived enemy — everyone who wasn’t HIM. That included the CULTURE in which the rest of us live.
Right Wing Culture is a lot like what Astrophysicist Neil deGrsse Tyson calls the ‘Diminishing God of the Gaps’ — the place you go to when you reach the end of what you ‘know’. Right Wing culture — once thought to be a significant part of American Culture is now understood to be a fringe element at best (and shrinking rapidly). Right Wing Culture is that thing everyone with a sense of humor laughs at.
It is a fact of life that Right Wing Culture has no sense of humor. Oh, it can laugh all right — at other people. Especially if they’re suffering some sort of misfortune. Then they turn hilarious. Right Wing Culture is sanctimonious. It believes it understands the divine; it believes the divine has chosen it to be its representative here on earth. Right Wing Culture is seriously delusional.
Right Wing Culture honestly believes that IT is American Exceptionalism — that its very whiteness and maleness and Christian-ness is exceptional. It’s wrong of course. America’s DIVERSITY is what makes it EXCEPTIONAL. That kind of broad diversity never happened before in one country. It produced remarkable — no, EXCEPTIONAL — results.
White Christian Male culture is the exact opposite of exceptional. Aside from rage and grievance, it can’t point to a single thing it’s added to the conversation. Being weak and having few weapons at its disposal, White Christian Male Culture counts on drawing us near enough to sneak in a dirty low blow to neutralize us.
They’re going to be disappointed this time. A lot more of us are woke now. We’re paying attention.
And — as much as we can — we’re doing the thing that cuts Trumpists & Religionistas & RW Culture Warriors deepest: We’re laughing at them.
A Thought Experiment: You walk into a room. Another person enters and punches you – hard. You ask — “What was that for?” And the other person responds “Because you killed my god”. Being a RATIONAL person who doesn’t want to get punched again — and who doesn’t want to resort to violence yourself — what’s your response?
There is no response. The moment you engage with that conversation, it wins — because YOU have to agree that its made-up bullshit could be true — otherwise, why are you arguing with them? Everything after — ‘But that’s not true…’ is a waste of time.
Want to know why Jew Hatred has lasted as long as it has? Because who can argue with someone who, to put it another way, thinks HARRY POTTER IS REAL? How can you argue with someone who clearly BELIEVES IN MAGIC? How can you argue with someone so confounded by the very texts they claim to ‘believe in’? How can you argue with people who are confounded by those texts because the INSTITUTION that assembled them and shaped them and crafted them into a particular narrative had that very hostility toward the Mother Religion in mind?
Instead you get vilified. You get re-imagined as something you aren’t. You get to be “We hate Jews cos Jews killed Jesus”.
What was it Marx said about religion being the opiate of the people? He had that dead wrong. If only it were an opiate that medicated people or narcotized them. It’s much more like meth or angel dust. It gets brains hopped up on something almost entirely artificial.
There are great, meaningful, profound lessons to be taken from the assembled texts of the Old and New Testaments. Why is it religious people seem to take NONE of those lessons away with them? The whole reason Jesus’ message still resonates today — even in the minds of an atheist — is because it’s so essential to living a good life: “DO UNTO OTHERS”. But not only simple enough for even a troglodyte to grasp — “DO UNTO OTHERS” is ‘actionable’. it’s not some airy-fairy abstract notion of ‘goodness’, it’s a simple proposition: “How do YOU wish to be treated? Then treat every other person exactly that way.”
Boom. The genius that evolved at the very tail end of the Genesis through Book of Revelations story — its takeaway theme. The whole point of the exercise.
Except it was never about Jesus or the Jews or their message. Why on earth do you call it ‘Christianity’ anyway? Paul (the former Saul of Tarsus) is really the faith’s ‘inventor’. Paul’s the guy who broke with Jesus’ family — because they were happy being Jews while Paul had other ideas. That’s Paul, by the way, who (just going by the story here) never met Jesus ever. Or heard his voice. Or heard his message.
But it was Paul who ‘spread Jesus’ message’. Except — looking over the sales materials — all the letters and epistles Paul sent to the nascent congregations of non-Jews that were flickering to life all over the Roman Empire — Paul was spreading Paul’s message a lot more than he was spreading Jesus’.
Jesus (it was never his name — just like ‘god’ is not Yahweh’s name — it’s his job description) was born, lived his whole life as and died A Jew. If you called him a Christian to his face, he wouldn’t know what you were talking about. And if you told the Actual Jesus (if he ever really was) what YOU now believed because YOU believed in HIM — He’d be stunned. And he’d think you were insane. Because very little of what YOU believe is what HE believed.
Paul started out needing to deify Jesus. Paul traveled in messianic times. To make his case that Jesus was a more real deal than any of the others, he needed to conform Jesus’ story to the pre-existing Hebrew mythology — all those texts we now call the Old Testament. The messiah story had rules — and if Jesus was going to be the messiah, he had to fit into the rules. He had to be connected to King David. He had to be prophesied. He had to be born in a certain place under certain conditions.
Paul broke with Jesus’ family because they didn’t want to go there. They didn’t want or need to be part of another religion because they were perfectly happy being Jews — as Jesus had been.
If Jesus was an actual person, he existed in a world that ‘had rules’. It worked a certain way and didn’t work in lots of other ways. The temple hierarchy, for instance, behaved one particular way and not in a lot of other ways. Paul (or ‘the school of Paul’) — not having been there — and having an agenda — described the scene as he needed it to be and not as it was.
Paul’s bottom line was this: He needed a reason for Jesus’ deification — a purpose that accepting the faith would accomplish: Salvation. From Death. If Jesus could be resurrected, so can you.
None of that came from Jesus. The idea of ‘A Church’ certainly never came from Jesus. As I read the texts, Jesus wasn’t all that ‘down’ with the Institution. His whole deal — as I read what JESUS SAID (and not all the other drivel put into his mouth by ‘the apostles’ — check out The Jesus Seminar — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_Seminar — it was a group of 50 bible scholars and 100 laymen, founded in 1985 with the mission of discerning, if they could, an actual human Jesus from the texts), was you can have a direct relationship with the deity; you don’t need a temple or a church (or the institution inside them) to do it. In other words, to create a church around Jesus is to, right off the bat, do the OPPOSITE of Jesus.
But, what would Paul know?
Virtually everything about the story of Jesus’ death is a fiction. It’s no more real than Harry Potter. There are facts and then there’s bullshit. To hate Jews because they ‘killed Jesus’ is bullshit.
To KILL THEM because of it?
There are no words that can adequately describe it. Maybe one: “ANTISEMITISM”.
George Bernard Shaw put it this way — ‘The United States and Great Britain are two countries separated by a common language.”
Not that every Brit is Shakespeare — that would be a slight over-statement — but regardless of how profane they are by nature most Brits are a hell of a lot better at using the language to express themselves; it’s a subtle thing — having to do with not only word choices but just a general facility with the language itself. Britain’s is a more literary culture by nature and history. On the surface, its obsessions seem fuddy-duddy & Old World. Colonial even. And British culture is all those things — for better and worse.
One of the better cultural obsessions is the language. Brits are no match for the French when it comes to compulsive defensiveness regarding their language — the French have ‘L’Acadamie Francaise’ overseeing the language, literally allowing or not allowing (the most usual outcome) new words in. English (according to the Oxford English Dictionary) has 171,476 words in current use, and 47,156 ‘obscure’ words in more limited use. French, by comparison, has 100,000 words — roughly half as many. But (this is significant), each French word has an average of 3 definitions! Words are less descriptive by nature and more (my French professor at Vassar put it) “analytical”.
English literally grows every year as new words are added or coined. French doesn’t do that. Instead of inventing new words (or bringing foreign words into its vocabulary), it adds definitions or puts old words together to form a kind of French Language Pretzel. Even so — the French are simply proud of their language and see it as part of their cultural bulwark. That pride translates into not just a love for the language but an overall sense that how they say things is part of who they are — as individuals and as a culture.
Boy, was that long-winded.
The point is — The French and the English (among others) are far more connected to their languages than Americans are to English. We almost seem to speak English for lack of anything else to speak. Consequently, we Americans always seem more at odds with English than at peace with it. It’s more an obstacle to expressing ourselves than a tool.
If George Carlin had been English, he would never have conceived of ‘The 7 Dirty Words’. It wouldn’t have been on his radar. Yes, true, you couldn’t say any of those words on the BBC either, but it wasn’t because they quaked at the sound of them as we seem to. Even in public spaces, words that shock Americans get aired regularly. The broadcast moratorium on them is decorum and not the threat of legal action.
Here in America though, those words are always an issue. An example — I refrain from using the word ‘F*ck’ here on this blog. In order to be part of any possible ad revenue stream (such as there is one), one has to avoid using certain words. The title of this blog puts me in a hazy zone of quasi-acceptability. For all our ‘freedom of speech’, Americans sure seem intimidated by certain words.
And that’s the point (finally!)
Americans are intimidated by their own language. It goes beyond ‘swear words’. To a degree our sensitivity to oppressive words (the ‘n-word’, ‘kike’ (being a Jew, I get to use the word — how it is), et cetera is appropriate; it recognizes how certain words become weaponized. Those words are always aimed at specific groups — they are weaponized — and need to be seen as weapons.
We’re not talking about those words. It’s like comparing sex and rape. Not the same things as similar as they are in form.
Americans — being less comfortable and at home with their own language — have a terrible habit of using English to obscure truth rather than reveal it. Want to know what I mean? Listen to anyone in Congress yak away for 30 seconds. On average, they’ll use about 50 words when 10 would have sufficed. All those extra words add fog to the mix and not clarity.
When a Mitch McConnell is forced to answer questions, Mitch is a master at using words to completely misrepresent what he’s really saying. He gets away with it easily because so few Americans — including and especially our news media — are comfortable enough with the language to blow past its chaff to get to its wheat. If, after Mitch McConnell or Paul Ryan or Devin Nunes or Jim Jordan or Mike Pence or (especially) Donald Trump overtly lied to the public the media called their lies ‘LIES’ as opposed to ‘other points of view’ — we would begin to strip these people of their power to misuse and abuse the language.
Our cultural discomfort with sex-related words flows straight from the repressive religious prigs — the Pilgrims — who came here less for religious freedom than because their religion was just plain wacky — and the Church of England wanted them gone. It seems to be a constant among humans: intense religious feelings and sexual repression are soul mates. They go together like peanut butter and jelly, yin and yang, republicans and corruption.
This twisted unease with sexuality expresses itself in perverse ways. I think I ‘got it’ about American culture when I was a kid. I don’t mean that certain words and images were ‘restricted’ — I mean that those restrictions were symptoms of a deeper, darker dysfunction. A vivid memory from my youth: I’m in high school — a huge Kurt Vonnegut reader. ‘Slaughterhouse Five’ is a seminal book in my development.
Back then, the media stone age, there were 3 networks: ABC, CBS, NBC. That’s it. On the night in question, CBS is running the last night of its multi-night mini-series ‘HELTER SKELTER’ — the story of the Mansion Family and the Tate-LaBianca murders. NBC counter-programmed the premier broadcast run of the film version of ‘Slaughterhouse Five’. Two ‘events’.
I didn’t care about ‘Helter Skelter’. I cared about ‘Slaughterhouse Five’. But I did flip back and forth a little — because the last part of ‘Helter Skelter’ is the most compelling: the murders themselves. Here’s where it got weird — and where we, as a culture, revealed ourselves.
On CBS, if one watched, one could experience a dramatized but nonetheless horrifying version of an actual event — murder, bloodshed, unspeakable cruelty.
On NBC, if one watched, one experienced a profound anti-war movie that spoke directly to the human condition. I am absolutely not making a judgement about one story good, one story bad. Both were excellent, valid stories that needed to be told. But one revealed the very worst of us and one wanted to speak to the best in us.
At the end of ‘Slaughterhouse Five’, Billy Pilgrim, the hero (he’s ‘unstuck in time’ — able to travel between various moments in his own life including his own birth and death) visits a time in his life when he’s a ‘prisoner’ in a zoo on the planet Tralfamadore. There, he’s been put into a comfortable enclosure that he shares with a well known adult performer Montana Wildhack; the two are meant to breed — which they do.
While ‘Helter Skelter’ climaxes with chaos and mayhem, ‘Slaughterhouse Five’ climaxes with Billy Pilgrim imagining a terrible war crime — the Allied bombing of Dresden, German during WWII — being reversed: the firestorm goes out as the bombs that caused them fly back up into the Allied bombers that dropped them. The coda to this vision is Billy Pilgrim and Montana Wildhack in their enclosure — Montana having just given birth to their baby.
Montana puts the baby to her breast and feeds it. She breast-feeds her baby (a hopeful symbol — feeding the future). But, because the shot involved actress Valerie Perine’s naked breast, it had to be CUT.
So — on CBS: murder and mayhem in horrifying (but valid) detaili.
On NBC: Breastfeeding babies is verboten.
That, right there, sums us up. It sums up our culture. It sums up our attitude toward language. You can describe in all the detail you want on the American public airwaves ways to kill people.
Don’t you DARE however, describe all the ways you’d like to LOVE people.
What the f*ck is the word for ‘that’?
Understand — by ‘baby talk’ I do not mean anything remotely ‘gaa-gaa-goo-goo’. I mean Americans need to speak like grown-ups when speaking about grown-up subjects. Like Racism. Or Bigotry. Or Treason.
But Americans — the talking head class anyway — have a terrible habit of baby-talking everything — of talking down to the audience as if the Cold Hard Facts would be more than our tender snowflakey white sensibilities could handle. That may be true for the Snowflakes in the audience but the rest of us have a few scars and welts on us — that cured US of any possible baby talk addiction.
Using the word ‘wee-wee’ in place of, say, ‘penis’ is dubious practice with a 5 year old. Right off the bat it sets certain words apart. These are dangerous words. The subtext travels right along with the word as it burrows into our minds. The culture’s discomfort becomes our discomfort.
Hello, ‘baby talk’.
The epitome is comics having to work ‘clean’ when on broadcast television. The baby talk gets laughs — uncomfortable laughs — because it sets off all the alarm bells baby talk is meant to set off: We’re talking about something we shouldn’t… we’re not ‘adult’ enough.
Yeesh! When someone lies to you — they’re not dissembling or hedging or ‘yes-but-ing’, they’re lying.
Let’s start there.
It is unconscionable that it took so long for a few of the MSM to call Donald Trump out on his lies. Now — if only they could do it to his face. Sometimes, just the refusal to say something — to speak the truth (especially to the world’s biggest man-baby of all time) is the baseline equivalent of Baby Talk.
The first time or two, no doubt — Donald Trump will bristle and react like he’d been zapped in the nutsack. But then he’ll adapt to it. He’ll say: “Yeah — I’m lying. What of it?” He’ll expect us to shrug and say nothing.
Or — he’ll expect us to baby talk him — as everyone does.
Historically, Trump can’t deal with being opposite smart people. They make him feel every bit as inadequate as he actually is. Adult talk is not only anathema to Trump — it’s his kryptonite. Adult talk – focused Adult talk – is to Donald Trump what salt is to a slug. Don’t believe me? Let’s try it out…
How many guilty Catholic priests does it take to screw in a light bulb? Better question — How many guilty Catholic priests (guilty of SCREWING children) does it take before a Culture opens its damned eyes?
That blind spot isn’t the Catholic Church’s alone. The man who sexually assaulted me worked for a synagogue. Jews do it too. And Protestants and Muslims. I suspect other religions do it, too but I’m not too well-versed in their cultures; I know from Abrahamic religions — they all flow from the same toxic male bias. The religious elements are all really just ‘overlays’ of male self-aggrandizement. If you really, really look at them, Abrahamic religions have a nasty habit of making its male believers believe not so much ‘in’ a god as that ‘THEY THEMSELVES’ are gods.
They are not made in Yahweh’s image (Yahweh’s his name, god is his job description), Yahweh is made in theirs.
When you start out — deep down — thinking YOU are ‘the gods’ — and if YOU have control of the Culture (made much easier when you tell everyone that YOU and YOU alone can communicate with ‘the gods’) — things like ‘bias’ just sort of flow naturally. Like toxic waste from a turd factory.
What we Americans need to grasp is that we begin every conversation or debate about who we are with a heavy bias that distorts our image. We are NOT that thing the Culture insists we are. We are not predominantly White-Christian-Male — and never were.
But, when you jealously guard the means to tell stories to the widest possible audience, you risk fooling yourself first and foremost.
White-Christian-Male Culture wants us all to believe their excrement smells like roses. It doesn’t. They know better than anyone.
They’ve stacked the deck best they can to keep hold of their Ivory Tower. Problem is, they’re surrounded — by the rest of us. We need to overtake them — remove them from their tower and then remove their tower, too. It all needs to go.
It will start — shortly — with our votes.
My Spiritual Guru — MulliganJesus.com — loves how Americans have turned religion into a kind of glorified fast food menu. He created this —
Would you like a side of sanctimony with your ‘Whopper’?